What was decided?
The countries spent seven hours arguing over the final text of the deal in a meeting that ended at 3:30 a.m. Monday local time. They eventually agreed on 23 targets, most notably the “30×30” target to protect 30 percent of land, fresh water and oceans by 2030.
There will also be targets to protect ecosystems such as rainforests and wetlands and to recognize the rights of indigenous peoples.
“It was inspiring to see firsthand how Indigenous knowledge and the ongoing vibrant culture in Montreal has been so prominent through advocacy for Indigenous peoples,” said Melanie Herdman, Executive Chair of Country Needs People, Rarrtjiwuy, following the meeting traveled to Canada.
There was a goal of “sustainable use” of biodiversity to recognize that species and habitats provide services to humanity, such as food and clean water.
Australia, led by Environment Secretary Tanya Plibersek, has been pushing for many of the critical inclusions in the pact – including the 30 per cent conservation target – but has been unable to garner global support for a version of its own domestic zero-extinctions policy announced earlier that year .
Instead, the global agreement pact stipulates that the man-made extinction of endangered species should be stopped by 2050.
“That’s a real problem for me — we can’t wait another 28 years to stop extinction because by then we’ll have a very different planet,” Wintle said.
What was missing?
Funding was one of the most contentious issues, with 70 African, South American and Asian countries dropping out of the negotiations at one point.
There was a pledge to flow $30 billion a year from wealthy to poorer countries by 2030, but this was not legally binding and was sparse in detail.
Some African countries complained that the deal had been undemocratically enforced by China, claiming it ignored objections from the DRC.
Unlike similar climate agreements, this biodiversity pact lacks a binding “ratcheting” mechanism that requires governments to step up their policies and targets.
In Australia, scientists estimate that the federal budget would need about $2 billion each year to adequately fund the restoration of the country’s nearly 2,000 threatened species and ecological communities.
And while observers hailed the 30 x 30 target as a positive first step, they were disappointed that Australia failed to bring new funding commitments for the meeting.
Even already protected Australian areas like national parks and indigenous sanctuaries are being overrun by wild foxes, deer, camels, cats and invasive plant species like prawns.
“If we let our planet sink into the depths of the sixth mass extinction, it will take tens of millions of years or more for it to recover,” said Sarah Bekessy, associate professor of sustainability at RMIT.
Get to the point of what’s happening to climate change and the environment. Our 14-day environmental newsletter brings you news, problems and solutions. Sign up here.
https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/the-global-pact-to-save-biodiversity-is-historic-but-here-s-what-it-leaves-out-20221220-p5c7ne.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_environment The historic global pact to stop biodiversity destruction