Mark Meadows, White House Chief of Staff, listens to a question from a member of the media outside the White House in Washington, DC, U.S., on Wednesday, October 21, 2020.
Chris Kleponis | Bloomberg | beautiful pictures
Lawmakers investigating the January 6 invasion of the Capitol will vote on Monday to recommend that the House hold President Donald Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows in contempt of Congress.
The vote, scheduled for 7 p.m. ET, will make Meadows the third Trump associate to face the threat of possible criminal charges stemming from the investigation into the death attack. people, in which hundreds of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol and forced Congress to flee their chambers for safety.
Trump, who was impeached in the House of Representatives for inciting an uprising but acquitted by Republicans in the Senate, since leaving office has continued to spread false claims about an election. “cheating” in 2020, prompting many of his followers to violently break into the building.
Bipartisan, nine-member council set to vote a 51-page report that sets out the case of the Meadows Detention Center contemptuously for defying subpoenas to deliver mass files and requests for removal. The House can then vote to send a contempt resolution to the Justice Department for possible criminal prosecution.
Report, released the night before the panel vote, sheds light on the thousands of documents Meadows provided to investigators before he reversed course and filed a lawsuit to void their two subpoenas.
According to the committee’s report, the documents described but not fully shared show Meadows discussing the January 6 attacks and efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the President’s victory. Joe Biden.
- Meadows said in an email that the National Guard will be on site January 6 to “protect Trump supporters” and will have more members on standby;
- Meadows received a text message about an alleged plan for Republican lawmakers to send “alternatives” of electoral college to Congress. “I love it,” Meadows replied to one such message. “There’s a team up there,” he replied to another;
- Meadows sends a complaint about election fraud to the leadership of the Department of Justice;
- Meadows texted an organizer of the January 6 rally outside the White House, after the organizer told him, “[t]hings has gone crazy and i desperately need some direction. Please.”
Trump has stated that many of the documents sought by House investigators should be withheld on the basis of executive privilege, the doctrine that allows certain White House communications to remain private.
The former president has also cited claims of privilege as the basis for directing many former aides, including Meadows, to disobey the committee’s subpoenas.
However, Biden gave up executive privileges over many of the White House records, prompting Trump to file a civil lawsuit to prevent the committee from receiving them from the National Archives.
Both a federal district court judge and a A panel of three appellate court judges rejected Trump’s argument that, in a dispute of executive privilege, his claims should prevail over the incumbent president’s judgment. Trump is expected to ask the Supreme Court to overturn the appellate court’s ruling.
On Monday morning, an attorney for Meadows sent selection committee chair Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., a letter argued that a contempt referral in this case “would be against the law, clearly unfair, unwise and unjust.” The letter argued that the appeal for Meadows’ favor was made in “good faith” and that the mention of contempt by a former senior aide to the president would be “greatly damaging to the President’s institution,” among other arguments.
(LR) Representative Bennie Thompson (D-MS), chair of the selection committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol, speaking as Representative Liz Cheney (R-WY), deputy The chairman of the January 6 investigative selection committee that attacked the Capitol, Representative Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) and Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) listen during a committee meeting on Capitol Hill on Jan. December 1, 2021 in Washington, DC.
Drew Angerer | beautiful pictures
The House of Representatives voted to hold former White House senior adviser Steve Bannon in contempt for his own non-compliance with a subpoena issued by the panel on January 6. The state then charged Bannon with two counts of contempt of Congress.
Bannon has pleaded not guilty. If found guilty, he faces a maximum sentence one year in prison and a fine of up to $100,000 for each count. A federal judge has set a tentative start date of July 18 for Bannon’s trial.
Last week, the selection committee voted conduct contempt proceedings against former Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, though investigators also granted him an extension of time to comply with the investigation.
Meadows’ lawsuit asks the court to invalidate the subpoenas the jury gave him and Verizon, his former personal cell phone carrier, calling them “too broad and too burdensome.” “
His argument relies heavily on Trump’s directive for him not to comply with the subpoena, citing the claim of executive privilege. The suit argues that Meadows “was placed in the unacceptable position of choosing between conflicting privilege claims.”
It was filed the day before Trump lost his case when an appeal prevented the committee from obtaining disputed White House files.
The selection committee rejected Meadows’ argument. The contempt report said: “To be clear, Mr. Meadows’ failure to comply with and this contempt recommendation was not based on good faith disagreements over privileged assertions.
“Instead, Mr. Meadows failed to comply with and warrant disparaging findings because he completely refused to give any testimony and refused to answer questions regarding the information even.” even explicitly non-privileged – information he himself has identified as non-privileged through the production of private documents.”
The report states that Trump himself did not forward any privileged statements to them regarding Meadows’ participation in their poll. They note that Biden, the sitting president, did not invoke privilege to prevent Meadows from complying.
After months of negotiations, an agreement was signed for Meadows to share certain records and appeared to drop the investigation on January 6. According to committee member Adam Schiff, D-Calif, he delivered about 9,000 pages of files with no prerogatives attached.
But the day before his removal, Meadows told the committee he would not attend “even in response to questions about documents he agreed were relevant and unprivileged that he had just submitted.” out,” the report said.
That reversal came on the day of the release of Meadows’ book, which chronicles many of his experiences in Trump’s White House, including his interactions with Trump himself.
That book revealed that Trump in 2020 tested positive for coronavirus three days before his September debate with Biden. The White House did not disclose that positive test result at the time, but only shared a test result before the debate that later came back negative.
Trump has denied having Covid before or during the debate. He was hospitalized with the virus a few days after the debate.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/13/house-jan-6-probe-sheds-light-on-trump-aide-mark-meadows-records-before-contempt-vote.html House of Representatives January 6 poll sheds light on Trump aide Mark Meadows’ profile ahead of contempt vote